Enrolling and retaining a representative population in the NIH Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER)-Adult cohort
Berry, J; Gander, JC; Lu, J; et al., Research Square, July 2026
View Preprint on PubMedPublication Details
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10092514/v1
Abstract
Background: Vulnerable populations are underrepresented in clinical studies. The design of the national RECOVER-Adult cohort study aimed to over-enroll underrepresented populations to ensure the representation of vulnerable populations in the U.S. We quantify and assess follow-up visit completion among a representative population in the RECOVER-Adult cohort.
Methods: Between October 2021 and October 2023, we enrolled adult participants across 16 hub-sites in the U.S. Community outreach was used to gather and incorporate feedback prior to and during study implementation. Recruitment methods included electronic and in-person outreach by individuals trained in diversity, equity, and inclusion at health centers, health departments, and community-based organizations, as well as snowball sampling. Study staff maintained regular contact with participants between study visits via phone, email, and text, and arranged free transportation to support attendance.
Results: Of the 14,880 adult participants who were enrolled in the RECOVER-Adult Cohort Study, 14,531 participants (mean[SD] age: 47.1[15.5] years, 57.0% Non-Hispanic White, 27.7% Male) completed a baseline visit. Over 85% of participants completed the first four follow-up visits, while over 90% completed a last visit. Across follow-up visits, participants who identified as minoritized groups, younger, LGBTQIA+, had less education, did not speak English, lived in a rural area, and reported a disability were less likely to complete their visits, while older and female participants were more likely to complete them.
Conclusions: Our findings indicate that enrollment is more feasible than retaining a sociodemographically-representative study population, highlighting a need for innovative approaches to sustain on-going study participation in the post-pandemic era.
Authors
Jasmine Berry, Jennifer C Gander, Jun Lu, Franchesca Amor A Aguilar, Larissa Teunis, A Blythe Ryerson, Sarah de Ramirez, Sarah E Donohue, Christina Mehta, Jenny E Han, Sushma K Cribbs, Tiffany A Walker, Yasha Joseph, Priscilla Pemu, Vincent C Marconi, Zanthia Wiley, Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez, Ingrid V Bassett, Nasser Sharareh, Igho Ofotokun, Marissa Edmiston, Vidhi Javia, Jannah Elchommali, Cynthia Ifejika, Ke'Ara Brown-Smith, Walter Asencios, Imani Elsey, Samer Sader, John W Hafner, Monica Hendrickson, Sara W Kelly, Sairam Parthasarathy, Kristen Pogreba-Brown, Perla Nunes, Leah Castro, Doreen Stein-Seroussi, Kian Nguyen, Robynn Saldino, Janelle Linton, Stacey Riddick, Jasmine Briscoe, Jerry A Krishnan, Lynn B Gerald
Keywords
COVID-19; Long COVID; diversity; epidemiology; recruitment; retention